Who will be affected by the Rachel Reeves £2m mansion tax?
The new annual surcharge on homes over £2m has been positioned as a targeted, progressive measure, yet this is overwhelmingly a London and South East tax. Outside those areas, the proportion of £2m homes barely registers.
In parts of central London, however, entire neighbourhoods sit far above the £2m threshold, which means thousands of households are now staring down the barrel of a recurring annual bill from 2028.
Reactions across the property industry follow a clear theme. Many describe the measure as a mansion tax in all but name, and a levy that hits people who bought modestly decades ago only to find their homes now sitting above an arbitrary line. Some argue it feels like a punishment.
Long term owners who are asset rich but cash poor could struggle the most, forced to absorb another cost they never planned for. Others warn of a freeze in the prime market because buyers will hesitate to purchase a home that comes with a permanent annual surcharge. Sellers may end up cutting prices simply to move on.
Concerns extend beyond London’s trophy postcodes. In the South East, homes between £2m and £4m are already seeing significant price reductions, and this policy could deepen the divide between the higher and mid price brackets. There is also anxiety that this becomes a new cliff edge at £2m, distorting behaviour for years.
Renting may also be affected because if the surcharge is collected through council tax, the liability will sit with tenants and increase their monthly costs.
The one positive note is timing. With implementation set for April 2028, households who want to downsize have a sizeable window to act. Many are expected to do so rather than carry a new annual charge into retirement.
More details on the other changes for homeowners and landlords to follow on what this means for the local property market in the coming week.